Re: Documenting "touchy" applications?

Subject: Re: Documenting "touchy" applications?
From: Peter <pnewman1 -at- home -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:49:40 -0500

Jan Henning wrote:

> The first thing you should try, IMHO, is to get the developers to do it
> right. 'Right' in this case is that any reasonable expectation the user
> has should be fulfilled, and if the user wants to open a directory, he or
> she can reasonably expect to be able to do so in either half of the window.

That is the sort of thing that leads to bloated code. Suppose a decision
is made that the user should also be able to get the desired result with
a mouseOver as well as a right click. etc.


"When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a
minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute-and it's
longer than any hour. That's relativity,"
- Einstein-

PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at

Check out the TECHWR-L Site redesign!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Documenting "touchy" applications?: From: John Posada
Re(2): Documenting "touchy" applications?: From: Jan Henning

Previous by Author: Re: How are Technical Writer's Perceived
Next by Author: Re: Use of Photos in Documentation
Previous by Thread: Re(2): Documenting "touchy" applications?
Next by Thread: Re: Documenting "touchy" applications?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads