Re: huh?

Subject: Re: huh?
From: Jan Henning <henning -at- r-l -dot- de>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 08:17:21 +0200

Thanks for your replies. Most of them pretty much said the same thing, and most of them were from people who didn't really agree with the statement in the first place.

Anyway, thanks specifically to Jeff. That was a very lucid, even, fair assessment. :-) I too, would have to fall into the third camp......

It should be noted, however, that Janice made a statement about _editors_ while Jeff and most others commented on _writers_. Not the same thing, and it isn't clear to me that both need the same skills.

Jan Henning

Jan Henning
Am Schlossberg 14, D-82547 Eurasburg, Germany

Phone: +49 700 0200 0700, Fax: +49 8179 9307-12
E-Mail: henning -at- r-l -dot- de, Web:


Order RoboHelp X3 in May and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, PLUS
free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order RoboHelp today:

ATTENTION FrameMaker Users: Fill-out the following survey to receive a chance to win a FREE RoboScreenCapture.
FM users only please:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

re: huh?: From: Sean Hower

Previous by Author: Re: Language-problems with PDF-bookmarks
Next by Author: Re: Object Oriented Stuff (OOS)?
Previous by Thread: re: huh?
Next by Thread: Re: huh?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads