Re: Employment....

Subject: Re: Employment....
From: Phil Snow Leopard <philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com>
To: Kat Kuvinka <katkuvinka -at- hotmail -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:43:38 +0700

On 29 Feb 2012, at 01:08, Kat Kuvinka wrote:

> Prospective employers cannot be so naive as to think conflict does not exist, and that workers never leave because they are unhappy or are released because the are invaluable.

I don't think that's the reason why criticism of current or former employers doesn't play well. Like a lot of interview questions, its more what it says about the interviewee's awareness of interview skills.

Interviewers like to see - as a necessary, not sufficient condition - that candidates are sufficiently keen for the post by having prepared themselves for the interview. That's why you still get all those stupid questions about strengths and weaknesses. The answers don't matter per se (well, unless you start saying outlandish things); it's the display of being prepared for the question that counts. It marks one check box off on the interviewer's sheet: candidate is sufficiently motivated for the job.

Similarly, criticising former/current employers tells the interviewer that the candidate is either

i. not aware of interview norms (therefore, hasn't done their research on how to be successful in an interview and, consequently, isn't sufficiently motivated to get the job) or

ii. knows the norm but breaks it in the 'heat of the moment' (a sign the candidate lacks emotional self-control).

Tech Writer

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


RE: Employment....: From: philstokes03 -at- gmail -dot- com
Re: Employment....: From: Wanda Phillips
Re: Employment....: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: Employment....: From: Kat Kuvinka

Previous by Author: Re: Mac laptops and Tech Comm
Next by Author: Re: Employment....
Previous by Thread: Re: Employment....
Next by Thread: Interviewing for a job (was Employment)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads