Re: Document tagging and metadata

Subject: Re: Document tagging and metadata
From: Jay Maechtlen <techwriter -at- laserpubs -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:46:31 -0700

sorry - meant to trim that more.
Tagging and metadata are topics that we TWs may get tangled up with, but really belong to other disciplines.
I'm wondering where you'd look first in an organization for that expertise.
(librarians and/or records management?)

On 9/26/2014 10:42 AM, Jay Maechtlen wrote:

On 9/23/2014 6:44 AM, Sweet, Gregory (HEALTH) wrote:


*Metadata and abstracts are required.

The CMS, among requiring other metadata (dates, abstract, etc.), forces content providers to tag content with information about who that content is useful to. The content providers gets to see all of their content in one place, while the content consumer gets a pre-filtered view of the data based on the tags.

* Strict implementation of tags.
* Tags presented as "folders" to users.
* There is flexibility for incrementing values.

The "folder" structure created by this approach is strictly restricted to five levels deep so no single document is ever more than 6 clicks from the homepage.

Content creators cannot create new tags on the fly but must select from the tag taxonomy, or provide a really strong use case as to why what we've provided will not work.

We are flexible on tags that should increment. For example so documents should be tagged by year. No one need request a 2015 when 2015 arrives, we simply increment the tag as necessary.

I am curious about the tags - I suspect it was a non-trivial effort to create/determine those.
Was that done in collaboration with other groups?



--
Jay Maechtlen
626 444-5112 office
626 840-8875 cell
www.laserpubs.com


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
P&P suggestions: From: Jay Maechtlen
Re: P&P suggestions: From: Peter Neilson
RE: P&P suggestions: From: Sweet, Gregory (HEALTH)
Document tagging and metadata (was: P&P suggestions): From: Jay Maechtlen

Previous by Author: Document tagging and metadata (was: P&P suggestions)
Next by Author: Re: RTFM? Really?
Previous by Thread: Document tagging and metadata (was: P&P suggestions)
Next by Thread: RE: Document tagging and metadata (was: P&P suggestions)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads