TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:dynamic review model From:Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com> To:"techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:17:41 +0000
The good(?) old 2 drafts and Camera Ready review model seems dated for what is actually going on between writers and reviewers: lots of partial drafts, not enough/too many review cycles, fragmented review (each reviewer is responsible for a set of topics, but no architect responsible overall), skype-based walkthrough reviews. Is there a more modern approach, theoretical or practical that deals with the above problems?
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com