dynamic review model

Subject: dynamic review model
From: Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:17:41 +0000

The good(?) old 2 drafts and Camera Ready review model seems dated for what is actually going on between writers and reviewers: lots of partial drafts, not enough/too many review cycles, fragmented review (each reviewer is responsible for a set of topics, but no architect responsible overall), skype-based walkthrough reviews. Is there a more modern approach, theoretical or practical that deals with the above problems?
Erika
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Check box or toggle switch?
Next by Author: Re: PDF Markups >> Hard Copy
Previous by Thread: Re: BFME ?
Next by Thread: Re: dynamic review model


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads