Re: dynamic review model
Maybe approval workflow software such as Comala Workflows.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The kind of anarchic / chaotic mess you're describing doesn't seem
particularly modern to me. I think that's been a common style at
software companies for over 20 years.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com> wrote:
The good(?) old 2 drafts and Camera Ready review model seems dated for what is actually going on between writers and reviewers: lots of partial drafts, not enough/too many review cycles, fragmented review (each reviewer is responsible for a set of topics, but no architect responsible overall), skype-based walkthrough reviews. Is there a more modern approach, theoretical or practical that deals with the above problems?
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
dynamic review model: From: Erika Yanovich
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine