Re: dynamic review model

Subject: Re: dynamic review model
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:30:38 +0000

Yeah. I have trouble with this, too. We use workflows for releasing
published vs draft information, but the system is not used for tracking
reviews and sign off.

That has to be done manually, where you reviewers test the doc against a
definition of done. Then, any future changes have to be weighed as a fix to
the expression or a need for additional technical review.

One and done is not possible (or desirable) in Agile. But you have to pick
your battles.

-Tony

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:17 Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com> wrote:

> The good(?) old 2 drafts and Camera Ready review model seems dated for
> what is actually going on between writers and reviewers: lots of partial
> drafts, not enough/too many review cycles, fragmented review (each reviewer
> is responsible for a set of topics, but no architect responsible overall),
> skype-based walkthrough reviews. Is there a more modern approach,
> theoretical or practical that deals with the above problems?
>
> Erika
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca -dot-
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
>
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
>
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
>
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
dynamic review model: From: Erika Yanovich

Previous by Author: Re: Using SharePoint to host documentation
Next by Author: Re: PDF Markups >> Hard Copy
Previous by Thread: Re: dynamic review model
Next by Thread: InDesign > Missing Fonts


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads