TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: dress codes From:Ad absurdum per aspera <JTCHEW -at- LBL -dot- GOV> Date:Thu, 21 Oct 1993 18:43:43 GMT
> Dress "codes" vary according to the industry and region
I've done good work while wearing army boots and a flannel
shirt  and while wearing a suit, the other people around
me being dressed similarly. I'm not sure that these
superficial aspects can be correlated to morale, performance,
etc. -- either positively or negatively.
A highly motivated pro is a highly motivated pro, and a drone
is a drone. A supportive corporate culture is a supportive
corporate culture, and a madhouse is a madhouse. Whether it
is customary to wear a jacket and a neck restrictor while at
your desk is another story entirely.
I will assert, though, that there usually *is* at least a de
facto dress code anywhere -- once you've vibed in on the
organization's culture, you can tell what costume will mark
someone as a stuffed short, or a nerd, or a weirdo, or a
ladder-climber, or a Significant Other-hunter, or whatever.
Just because everybody is sitting around in Rockports and
Dockers, or the head of software development has a surfboard
in the office, doesn't mean that some people won't lay
judgements based merely on appearances... or that the company
will treat you well on payday. People are people everywhere.
"Just another personal opinion from the People's Republic of Berkeley"
Disclaimer: Even if my employer had a position on the subject,
I probably wouldn't be the one stating it on their behalf.