TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Karen Mayer wrote:
> What size monitors do you use? Are you happy
> with that?
I use a SuperMac Platinum 21, a high-resolution grayscale monitor:
21-inch --- so I can see a complete double-page spread with minimal distortion
grayscale --- since most color monitors look fuzzy to me and give me
headaches (except for a $38k video graphics workstation I saw at a recent
computer show <envy,lust,envy>)
> If you're using 21s, how did you
> manage to convince your manager that it was out of
> necessity, not decadence, that they were requested?
Since I -am- my manager, this wasn't an issue <grin>. However, I've used
the following strategy to convince a client to let me work offsite with my
own equipment instead of onsite with their 17-inch color monitors.
The project was to (a) update a series of documents and (b) transfer them
to FrameMaker. The client had never used off-site contractors before and
was concerned about 'monitoring productivity.'
On Friday, I took home a representative chunk of the project, and spent 7
hours designing the FrameMaker template and entering/editing text.
On Saturday, I arranged to spend 8 hours on site doing the same tasks for
another document (different purpose, therefore different templates needed).
I arranged for the extra hour because of the additional breaks I need to
prevent eyestrain when working with a color monitor.
Because it was on the weekend, there were no interruptions, no phone calls,
very little background noise, and no other workers to slow down the network
--- in short, environmental conditions were as similar to my home office as
possible. The major difference was the monitor.
I spent approximately the same amount of time on the design phases, since
the documents were of roughly equal complexity. But I got almost 20% more
text entered/edited using the larger monitor. Why?
(1) I could see both ends of two adjacent pages at once --- no scrolling.
(2) I could constantly monitor spacing and visual balance. I didn't need
to stop and print to see -exactly- what I was getting on a double-page
(3) The higher resolution display made it easier to scan for errors, so I
could do my proofreading onscreen.
Since they had committed to pay me by the hour (I insist on that for onsite
contracts --- there are too many things they can do to waste my time), the
potential 20% savings convinced them. Maybe you can arrange a similar test
with your typical workload. Most managers will pay attention to real data.
Hope this helps,
@Kat_____ Kat Nagel
MasterWork Consulting Services Rochester, NY
LIFE1 (techwriting/docdesign) katnagel -at- eznet -dot- net
LIFE2 (vocal chamber music) PlaynSong -at- aol -dot- com