Re: worst documentation

Subject: Re: worst documentation
From: David Jones/KSBEISD <David_Jones/KSBEISD -dot- KSBEISD -at- DATAHUB -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 07:17:52 HST

>The manual for a product called DB Publisher was almost as bad. It was =
an add-in product for VPDOS (GEM). The version I got had no index, =
mismatched typography from chapter to chapter, missing pages, and a =
bunch of stupid jokes (" ... when you select a database format, DB's =
little ol' heart goes pitty-pat!").<

I second the nomination of the manual for DB Publisher. I have a copy of it
stuffed in a drawer around here -- the manual's horrible. Maybe explains why I
never bothered to do much with DB Publisher.

David Jones, Technical Writer
David_Jones/KSBEISD -dot- KSBEISD -at- Datahub -dot- com
Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estate

"I do not speak for my employer, my computer, or any other living thing."

TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-

Previous by Author: Re: Screen Captures in HTML - WMF files
Next by Author: Re: Generic formats
Previous by Thread: Worst documentation
Next by Thread: What is Intuitive? (was Re: Usability)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads