TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
To be quite honest, I wouldn't want to work for a company that asked for SAT scores, and as a recent college graduate and packrat, I actually still have a record of mine. Unless the job is as a professional test-taker, I can't see how the ability to score high on the SAT would be a remotely useful thing for a recruiter to know. Some of the most intelligent, innovative, and hard-working people I ended up with average or below average scores on their SAT's because they either had an off day or were poor at taking those types of standardized tests. I also knew people who scored ridiculously high on their SAT's who were lazy or unable to think creatively to save their lives. I find it really hard to believe that scores on a test the applicant would have taken AT LEAST 5 years ago would sway a recruiter one way or another...and if they do, I would have to question the recruiter's professionalism.
(BTW, this is not a case of sour grapes...an SAT-sponsored Natl Merit Scholarship paid my tuition for 4 years. No thanks to my score on the math part of the test:))