RE: apologies

Subject: RE: apologies
From: DaLy <swiggles247 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 10:29:10 -0700 (PDT)


If the build PASSED the Build Acceptance tests, the
Quality Assurance tests and the Beta tests, then were
those missing files really essential? The lack of
these files did not break the product, did it?

It seems to me that this company has more important
things to worry about (i.e. the incompetent QA and
Engineering departments). If the word "enhancement"
bothers you, call it a bug fix.


--- John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> wrote:
> If I'm told that a version is enhanced, I might ask
> what new enhancements were added.
> "Uhmmm...we enhanced it with some files that were
> missed in the last build that will now allow it to
> John Posada
> Senior Technical Writer
> Barnes&
> jposada -at- book -dot- com
> 212-414-6656
> icq: 178047452
> aim: jposada1
> "Here lies the body of William Jay.
> Who died maintaining his right of way-
> He was right, dead right, as he sped along
> But he's just as dead as if he were wrong
> ----The Boston Transcript"

Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.


Order RoboHelp X3 in May and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, PLUS
free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.

Order RoboHelp today:

ATTENTION FrameMaker Users: Fill-out the following survey
to receive a chance to win a FREE RoboScreenCapture.

FM users only please:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Pop-ups in MS Word 2000 SP-3 Help
Next by Author: RE: Including third-party Linux documentation
Previous by Thread: RE: apologies
Next by Thread: RE: apologies

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads