TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I think that it passed those criteria is an assumption that was not stated
in the original post, unless I missed it. I got the impression that it went
out as a poor build. OTOH, I'm up to my **** in content right now and only
skimming many of the messages.
From: DaLy [mailto:swiggles247 -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 1:20 PM
To: John Posada; TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: apologies
If the build PASSED the Build Acceptance tests, the
Quality Assurance tests and the Beta tests, then were
those missing files really essential? The lack of
these files did not break the product, did it?
It seems to me that this company has more important
things to worry about (i.e. the incompetent QA and
Engineering departments). If the word "enhancement"
bothers you, call it a bug fix.
--- John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> wrote:
> If I'm told that a version is enhanced, I might ask
> what new enhancements were added.
> "Uhmmm...we enhanced it with some files that were
> missed in the last build that will now allow it to
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.