Re: starting on page 2?

Subject: Re: starting on page 2?
From: Phil Snow Leopard <philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com>
To: Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:03:27 +0700

Fred, with all due respect, you seem to be contradicting yourself.

On the one hand you agree with my point that a style guide is specific to a context, and on the other you suggest that Chicago is the "most broadly applicable".

In any given context, a stye guide is either applicable or not. How large the domain of applicability is outside of that context is irrelevant as to whether it should be used or not in any given situation.


On 16 Sep 2011, at 21:58, Fred Ridder wrote:

> Phil Snow Leopard wrote:
> > APA is for academic writing, Chicago is for 'trade' or 'professional' writing.
> I have to disagree with both parts of this statement.
> The APA (American Psychological Association) style guide is only appropriate for a small segment of academic writing, namely psychology and the social sciences. It is basically useless and inappropriate for other types of academic writing.
> And while the Chicago Manual of Style is used in "'trade' or 'professional' writing", it's foundation is *academic* writing, since it is the house style guide of the University of Chicago Press, the largest university press in the US.
> The point is that there are many different types and subtypes of writing, not just a broad division between "academic" and "trade or professional". And because of this, there is a large number of style guides specific to many of these different types and subtypes. There are at least a half-dozen well known and widely used style guides for academic writing in specific fields (ACS for chemistry, ASA for social sciences, CSE for life sciences, MHRA and MLA for the arts and humanities, IEEE for computer science, etc.). The most comprehensive and therefore most broadly applicable academic style guide is Chicago, largely because the press that compiles it publishes such a broad range of academic and scholarly books and journals. But even Chicago is only partly appicable to most types of technical writing.
> -Fred Ridder


Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Re: starting on page 2?: From: Chris Morton
Re: starting on page 2?: From: Phil Snow Leopard
RE: starting on page 2?: From: Fred Ridder

Previous by Author: Re: starting on page 2?
Next by Author: Re: A PhD for Technical Writing?; was, "starting on page 2?"
Previous by Thread: RE: starting on page 2?
Next by Thread: RE: starting on page 2?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads