TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> Fred, with all due respect, you seem to be contradicting yourself.
> On the one hand you agree with my point that a style guide is specific
> to a context, and on the other you suggest that Chicago is the "most
> broadly applicable".
First of all, there is no contradiction in saying that different style guides are appropriate in different contexts and saying that CMS is more broadly applicable than APA.
Second, that wasn't your point. Your first point was:
> APA is for academic writing, Chicago is for 'trade' or 'professional'
And Fred disagreed. Persuasively, IMHO.
Your second point, which touched on context, was a defense of the "freshly-minted PhD":
> Your intern knew plenty of what he spoke; you just didn't understand
> that his knowledge was for a different audience and context.
And as I pointed out, this PhD was exhibiting his ignorance. He apparently knew only APA style and assumed it was universally applicable, regardless of audience and context.
> In any given context, a stye guide is either applicable or not. How
> large the domain of applicability is outside of that context is
> irrelevant as to whether it should be used or not in any given
The first sentence is partly true. In any given context, any one of several style guides may be applicable, and the definition of a given context -- how broadly or narrowly it's defined -- is a matter of judgment and circumstance that ultimately affects the style guide choice.
The second sentence is incorrect. If the aforementioned PhD had an understanding of APA's domain of applicability, knew something of various other style guides, and understood the size and degree of overlap of their domains, it wouldn't have taken weeks to get him to remove the APA blinders.
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-