Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docsthatWEREconfidential...

Subject: Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docsthatWEREconfidential...
From: "Monique Semp" <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "TechWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:26:03 -0700

Is there any actual history of large numbers of people whose previous employers have refused their requests to use documents they've prepared for them in portfolios? I've had several past employers and clients who asked me to redact portions of documents ... Most just say, "sure, go ahead," and sign on the dotted line when I present them with a letter of permission in which I promise to redact anything they want redacted.

This is a good point, and I think where I initially went astray in my assumptions about my own work was taking their refusal for me to enter their docs in STC competition as if it were a refusal to divulge any portion of a doc.

Certainly publicizing an entire doc (for competition) is a much different story from redacting a doc or publicizing small excerpts. And indeed, now that I'm asking for this more limited form of permission, it's being much more successful.

So good point!
-Monique


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Monique Semp
Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Monique Semp
Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Keith Hood
Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Monique Semp
2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Daniel Dern
Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs that WEREconfidential...: From: Monique Semp
Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs that WEREconfidential...: From: Daniel Dern
Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...: From: Monique Semp
RE: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: PDF flipbooks - any that're for single-sided?
Next by Author: Re: PDF flipbooks - any that're for single-sided?
Previous by Thread: Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...
Next by Thread: RE: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads