Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...

Subject: Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:11:10 -0400

On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:45:51 -0400, Cardimon, Craig <ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com> wrote:

I would vote for cowed. The wording in NDAs seems strict enough to put the Dread of Lawyers into Patton himself.

I remember my first encounter with intellectual-property and NDA documents, and my major fear was that my employer apparently claimed ownership of any fiction, music or poetry I might create, along with the technical stuff I was actually being paid for.

And yes, I did turn out some music and poetry. They never said a peep about claiming it. I thought the poems were pretty good, and so did two or one of my cow-orkers. I'm miffed. The legal action might have made me famous. "Zzzzzottt Computer Mega-Corp Sues Employee Over Poem Ownership. Story on Page 18."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Monique Semp
Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Monique Semp
Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Keith Hood
Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Monique Semp
2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs that WERE confidential...: From: Daniel Dern
Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs that WEREconfidential...: From: Monique Semp
Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs that WEREconfidential...: From: Daniel Dern
Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...: From: Monique Semp
RE: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...: From: Cardimon, Craig

Previous by Author: Re: FM serial number problems
Next by Author: Re: Are editors still needed today?
Previous by Thread: RE: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs thatWEREconfidential...
Next by Thread: Re: 2 Concerns with accepting NDAs... Re: portfolio docs that WEREconfidential...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads