TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive August 1994

---

837 messages

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

*.Sparky.*

• Re: Internet, internet, or InterNet?

<?>

• Ride to Region 6 Conference

Ad absurdum per aspera

• Re: Why paper books
• Re: FWD: Some Curious Writing Examples sent from a NEXTcontact at HP
• Re: Raunchy business names
• APS and E-Print
• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: Report on how kids can't write well
• What's an edit? (was Re: Computer jobs for liberal arts majors?)
• Breaking in (was Re: Computer jobs for liberal arts majors?)
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• [no subject]

Andreas Ramos

• Re: Network two PCs without a LAN adapter
• Re: Hobbe's Internet timeline
• Searching for jobs... (Monthly Posting)
• Re: re. Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: Business Names
• Re: report on how kids can't write
• Re: Business names

Andrew Smith

• What the f -at- #$?
• Digests and instructions
• Re: Weird store names (Sweeney Todds)
• Re: report on how kids can't write (nouns etc)

Anne Halseytechwriter

• Looking for work in Florida
• the 'thru' versus 'through' debate
• time for a new thread?

Anne Stankis

• Help bar
• Help Bar

Arlen P. Walker

• Re: Why paper books
• Re: Bad commentary and writing
• Re: How do You use the WWW?
• Re: How do You use the WWW?
• Re: Cursing on the net
• Re: FWD: ( ) English - It's a funny language (fwd)
• Re: weekend recreation
• Re: Software documentatio
• Re: one more business name
• Re: Business Names
• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: WinWord6 memory issues
• Re: Teaching kids to write bad[ly]
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re: It's all software (I _think_)
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Through wins over thru
• Re: pet peeves
• Re: A matter of degree
• Re: more silly names
• Re: pet peeves
• Re: Arlen's comments
• Re: liguistic lapses
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: in accordance with... -Reply
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Certification
• Re: Arlen's comments
• Re: more peeves
• Re: for Arlen
• Re: liguistic lapses

Arthur Comings

• Weird store names
• Cursing on the net
• Re: senseless drivel
• Raunchy business names
• re. Report on how kids can't write well
• Parts of speech

Barb Philbrick

• Ideas for presenting theo
• Is this why paper books w
• Re: metrics
• Re: Software documentatio
• Re: invalid
• Re: metrics
• Re: Raunchy business name
• Re: Usage of the word "th
• Re: Pet Peeves

Beryl Gorbman

• single sourcing help

Bob Lord, DTN 522-6614,

• FWD: ( ) English - It's a funny language (fwd)
• FWD: Non-English phrases-
• FWD: Some Curious Writing Examples sent from a NEXTcontact at HP
• FWD: I: U.S. Department of Education study---Kids doesn't right good. ;-)

Bob Seitz

• SF STC Aug mtg
• Sep SF STC mtg

Bonni J. Graham

• Re: Testing to Ensure Accuracy of Information
• Re: Would you trust these guys?
• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• Re: You may
• Business names and bad writing
• Re: re. Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: Providing/Handling feedback gracefully (was Re: Pulling my hair
• Re: Poll: does spelling matter?
• Re: Who can't write?
• DOS art programs
• Re: Certification for Technical Communicators

Bonnie Wilberscheid

• Re: Usage of the word "thru"

Brian Bennett

• Re: You may
• Bad resumes
• Re: Software documentatio
• Re: Software documentatio
• Re: Software documentatio

Brian S. R. Bennett

• Writing guidelines
• Colored Pens
• Re: Pet Peeves

BROWN14

• Re: Does Success Depend on Knowledge of What's Ahead?

burgamw1

• Metro Baltimore STC meeting

Carl Stieren

• Graphics packages for Windows
• GRAPHICS SURVEY

Carol Burnett [ San Jose ] (408)363-5250 x5250

• Re: another bad manuscript

Carol Collins

• Publications competition for northern California

Carrie Walljasper

• U.S. Department of Education study---Kids doesn't right good.

Caryn Rizell

• Re: Why doc aren't tested
• thru vs through

Charles Fisher

• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• Re: STC National Address please?
• STC Washington, DC Meetings (September)
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• test - please ignore
• Re: STC Washington, DC Meetings (September)

Charles P. Campbell

• Poll: does spelling matter?
• Spelling poll
• Re: temperature-range style

Cheng, Derek

• Apologies
• Corel Draw equivalent for DOS

Chet Cady

• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• Teaching kids to write bad[ly]

Chris Christopher

• Mailing list

Christie S. Johnson

• Re: quick question needs a quick response, please

Christopher M. Fisher

• Re: Breaking in
• Communication Planning
• Communication Planning

Chuck Banks

• Re: STC National Address please?

Chuck Martin

• More business names

Contr Karl E. Vogel

• Re: Report on how kids can't write well

Cynthia Schwartz

• Diagrams

D. Citron

• Re: Testing to Ensure Accuracy of Inform
• Re: Ellipses
• Re: Dirty words
• Internet, internet, or InterNet?
• Re: weekend recreation
• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• Re: heading choice
• Re: occupational hazards
• Re: Business Names
• Re: more silly names
• Re: Funny Business Names

Dale Washburn

• "which" hunt
• Re: long sentences

Dana

• Re: windows help

David A. Lenoir

• Writing in W. Europe

David Coleman

• EDS Employees

David Dubin

• TC as a job vs. profession
• TC as a job vs. profession
• Pet Peeves
• Re: Help Bar from Anne

David L. Bergart

• Re: How do You use the WWW?
• Re: WinWord6 memory issues

David M Girardot

• Re: Word 6.0 /Windows

David Oberstadt

• [no subject]
• Terri Rubin
• You asked for it...
• Haiku
• Peeves
• Barb's 'til and the rest of the story

David Sloboda

• Vancouver, B.C. STC chapter? Hello?
• Re: Vancouver STC? Hello?

David Venzke

• thesaurus and toner carts.

David W. Willson

• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: A matter of degree

Davison, Grant

• long sentences

Dawn-Marie Oliver

• Re: Would you trust these guys?

Debbie Campbell

• Experience w/ WordPerfect hypertext?
• Professional Engineering Requirements

Debbie Molinaro

• Re: Software documentatio
• Re: invalid
• Re: Software documentatio
• FrameMaker Temp needed
• Re: Providing/Handling feedback

Donna Ellis

• Re: Plug for learning sentence structure

Dorothy Champlin

• reference book
• reference book

Doug Fettig

• WINHLP-L Address

doug montalbano

• Re: Funny Business Names
• Re[2]: spelling- just do it!
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re[2]: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re: Certification for Technical Communicators

Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225

• Pre-Norman profanity
• Re: Pulling my hair out
• Building Help in Windows
• It's a Journalism thing; you wouldn't understand

Douglas J. Freeman

• TechComm STC competition

DSNACQ::HARRISON

• Re: humorous business names

Elaine Winters

• translations
• [no subject]
• Reading, Writing and Rapidly Decaying . . .
• Teleworking/Telecommuting

Elizabeth Lopez-Aguado

• Re: Hobbe's Internet timeline

Elna . Tymes

• Re: Screenshots
• Re: Software documentatio
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"

Eric Ray

• Messages Lost ( A Tale of ...
• Process Documentation
• Re: Advertisement?
• Information from TECHWR-L Listowner
• Re: Teaching kids to write well
• MISC> The World Wide Web by E-mail (fwd)

Erik Mueller-Harder

• Re: Pre-Norman profanity

Erlandes

• FALL Intern position

Faith Weber

• Re: Why kids can't write
• Re: Online vs. Hard-Copy

Fred M Jacobson

• Business Names

Gabe Goldberg

• Re: Editing (was: Pulling My Hair Out)
• Re: Re[2]: Why paper books
• Re: pet peeves

Gaylord Throckmorton

• Help-Wordperfect Macros
• THANKS - Macro edits

George F. Hayhoe III

• Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic
• Word 6.0 Problems
• Student Writing Assignments and Class Sizes
• Re: MasterHelp
• Certification
• Radio Shack Commercial

Giovanna

• Job Opening in Phoenix, AZ...

GKushmerek

• It's all software (I _think_)

Gleason Sackman

• MISC> The World Wide Web by E-mail (fwd)

Glen Accardo

• Re: Testing to Ensure Accuracy of Information
• Re: usability testing list?
• YABM*!
• CBIquick
• DEMOquick
• Re: YABM*!
• Re: Software documentatio
• Information for UNIX Help stuff (fwd)
• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: Why kids can't write well -Reply
• Re: Building Help in Windows
• Re: before/prior to
• Re: time for a new thread?

Grace Joely Beatty

• Re: heading choice

Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN

• Establishing a FTP/GOPHER Site for STC Boston

Gus Lemming

• Re: Software documentation

Gwen Gall

• Re: Propositions
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re: Who can't write?
• Re: Who can't write?
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: liguistic lapses
• Re: Pet Peeves
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: more peeves
• Re: more peeves
• Re: translations software

HALL Kirby

• DOCTORS, ENGINEERS, AND ALL THOSE WITH LARGER BRAINS THAN I
• Smug as a slug with a rug OR Why I got rid of Dr. Bald

Hall, Robert

• William Saffire's rules for writers

HARRISON

• Re: What the f -at- #$ ?

Heilan Yvette Grimes

• Re: another bad manuscript

Heli Roosild

• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: re. Report on how kids can't write well
• MasterHelp for help files
• Re: MasterHelp

HiMark

• Re: Writer's compensation
• Midlife Job Search

holland

• Peeve #9,462

Ilana Katz

• Advertisement?

J1 . DXW

• translations software

Jacobs Chris

• Re: re. Report on how kids can't write well

Jane Torpie

• training in the Boston area
• reference books for public relations writers
• reconditioned toner cartridges?

Janean Bowen

• Re: Please unsubscribe me

Janice Gelb

• Re: another bad manuscript
• Re: Pet Peeves -Reply

Jay Linden

• Business Names

Jay Mead

• Re: Non-English phrases...

Jay R. Cook

• ISO 9000 list

JBergen

• this list and disappearing messages
• Re: Word 6.0 /Windows

Jeff Mattson

• Re: Apple Publication Style Guide?

Jennifer Lautz

• Reading list
• layoffs at IBM

Jeri M. Massi

• Re: Word 6.0/Windows
• Please unsubscribe me

Jerry Blackerby

• Re: Business names

Jim Grey

• Re: another bad manuscript
• [no subject]
• Re: Ellipses
• Re: Business Names
• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• Invalid
• Re: heading choice
• Re: Business Names
• Editing (was: Pulling My Hair Out)
• Re: Business names and bad writing
• I'm Gone
• Re: Why kids can't write
• Re: Colored Pens
• Bonni's Theory
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Pet Peeves
• Re: Stress-relief editing on a Fri afternoon
• Re: A matter of degree
• For Arlen.
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?

Jobpost

• Tech Writers Needed - Northern VA

Joe Fockler

• Re: ??Tech Writing Seminar??

Johanna Manning

• Re: Report on how kids can't write well

John E. Brush

• Language Translation Programs
• Usage of the word "thru"
• Through wins over thru

John Eldard

• Re: Usage of the word "thru"

John Hooper

• test -- please ignore
• MasterHelp for help files
• Re: More frighteningly ignorant signage

John McClure - x8855

• ( ) English - It's a funny language

John Russell

• Re: one more business name
• Word 6.0 /Windows

JohnBrin

• Re: Why doc aren't tested
• Certification: STC looked at it at least once

Jonathan Leer

• UNIX GUI
• XV
• UNIX GUIs.

JonPrice

• Re: Reader's Reply Cards

JPG3

• Re: Accessing Winhelp-L
• Re: one more business name
• Re: one more business name
• Re: humor re: zen and the art of software documentation

jrose on BIX

• Network two PCs without a LAN adapter
• Re: Network two PCs without a LAN adapter
• Re: Advertisement?

Julie Gephart

• Re: pet peeves

Karen Kay

• Re: Those WWW summaries
• Archive retrieval script
• Ellipses
• Vertical ellipses
• Re: Ellipses
• Re: Ellipses
• Re: Dirty words
• Re: ellipses
• Re: Software documentatio
• Re: one more business name
• Re: WinWord6 memory issues
• Re: Pulling my hair out
• Re: Who can't write?
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re: Haiku
• Re: Colored Pens
• Re: The Ideal Pen Color
• Re: quick question needs a quick response, please
• Re: pet peeves
• Re: Stress-relief editing on a Fri afternoon
• Arlen's comments
• Re: Arlen's comments
• Re: F/C conversion
• Re: Stress-relief editing on a Fri afternoon
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: before/prior to
• Re: Value judgements about software
• Re: more peeves
• Re: Degrees F/C Conversion

Karen Molloy

• How to get the Apple Publication Style Guide

Karen Riley

• reconditioned toner cartridges?
• physicians and engineers

Karen Steele

• Crisis Giggles
• Midlife Job Search -Reply
• Business names
• Colored Pens
• pet peeves

Karla Kitalong

• usability testing list?
• another bad manuscript
• funny signs
• Re: Pulling my hair out (fwd)
• more silly names
• pet peeve

Karla McMaster

• Re: Why docs aren't tested
• Writing and criticism; was: pulling my hair out
• Re: Poll: does spelling matter?
• Re[2]: Docs not tested etc...
• Plug for learning sentence structure
• Re: Do engineers = programmers?
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re[2]: Do you equate engineers and programmers?

Kathleen Thompson

• Re: More business names

Kathryn Seifert

• general on-line help discussion group
• Re: more peeves

Kathy Vincent

• Re: Hobbe's Internet timeline
• Re: report on how kids can't write
• Need subscriber how-to info

Katrina Katz

• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"

Keith Ivey

• Re: temperature-range style

Kelly Hoffman

• Re: another bad manuscript
• Re: More business names
• Providing/Handling feedback gracefully (was Re: Pulling my hair out)

kEN Colburn

• Re: Internet, internet, or InterNet?

Ken Zuroski

• Need Westinghouse History

Kevin Ryan 415.428.2719

• trying to (temporarily) unsubscribe

Kim Ferri 415-428-2710

• usability testing list
• Bibliography

Kimberley Lackey

• Re: Pulling my hair out
• Re: report on how kids can't write
• Where to start?
• Masters Programs

Kristina Guiney

• Re: Report on how kids can't write well

LAGOLD.US.ORACLE.COM

• Seven words you can never say on radio or television
• Bad commentary and writing
• More business names
• Bad resume text

Lallie Heard

• Bad Manuscripts
• Restricting Use of 'Engineer'
• When Software Runs Amok

Lara Butterworth

• [no subject]

Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)

• Business Names

Laura J. Kirk

• Pet Peeves
• Certification

Laura Johnson

• Re: What the f -at- #$?
• Re: re. Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: report on how kids can't write
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re: temperature-range style -Reply
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: DOCTORS, ENGINEERS, AND ALL THOSE WITH LARGER BRAINS THAN I
• Re: more peeves

Laura Lemay

• Re: another bad manuscript
• Re: pet peeves

Laurie D Mann

• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• Re: Software documentatio

Laurie Miles temp

• unsubscribe

LAURIE2U

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 3 Jun 1994 to 4 Jun 1994

LaVonna Funkhouser

• Re: WWW summaries
• Re: WWW summaries
• Re: &*%$ words
• Re: Mosaic and Gopher
• Re: Mosaic and Gopher
• Those WWW summaries
• Re: occupational hazards
• Re: More business names
• invalid
• The Web described (WWW)
• regarding CIC PIC
• Re: Report on how kids can't write well
• Education reform (was re: Report on how kids...)
• Pen color
• Editing Checklist
• Re: Educational reform
• WC quote, was Re: Writing guidelines
• Re: windows help
• temperature-range style
• Re: Colored Pens
• Re: temp. ranges
• Re: Building Help in Windows
• Re: question Re: temperature-range style
• Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• pet peeves
• the copyed list
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• pet peeves and that extra $0.50
• Anon. FTP for STC: News from Tieline
• Dr. Horn's study.

Len Olszewski

• Re: Bonni's Theory

Less is more.

• Re: pet peeves
• Re: Certification for Technical Communicators
• Re: Value judgements about software

Lester Klein

• weekend recreation
• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: Why kids can't write well -Reply
• Re: Writing guidelines
• A matter of degree
• Re: pet peeves
• liguistic lapses
• On use of the exclamation mark
• Re: A matter of degree
• Re: liguistic lapses
• Re: A matter of degree
• Re: On use of the exclamation mark

Linda Anderson

• Help a Novice
• Pet Peeves
• Certification of Tech Writers

Linda Haynes

• Re: More business names
• Bluees Brothers

Linda Wolf

• Wanted: High Quality Graphics

Liz Babcock

• Interleaf conversion from V

Lori A. Moreland

• Re: Pulling my hair out
• Re: Some people want to fill the world with silly business names...
• Re: spelling- just do it!
• Re: For Doug M.-- thanks!
• Re: Rejection (aka "ding") letters
• !

Lori Klepfer MCOM

• for a list owner only, others can delete

Louise Penberthy

• need good references on interviewing
• Re: Educational reform
• Re: temperature-range style
• A cinquain (was Re: Correction)
• Re: I like thru
• Re: Arlen's comments

M. Edward Borasky (znmeb -at- plaza -dot- ds -dot- adp -dot- com)

• Re: Colored Pens

Margaret Gerard

• Re: Weird store names

Marilyn Gelman

• Re: Docs not tested etc...

Marilynne Smith

• Re: this list and disappe
• Re: Ellipses
• Re: Why docs aren't teste
• Midlife Job Search -Reply
• Re: Report on how kids ca
• Re: Report on how kids ca
• Business names and bad wr
• Re: Report on how kids ca
• Re: re. Report on how kid
• Re: Teaching kids to writ
• Re: pet peeves
• in accordance with...
• Re: Arlen's comments
• Re: pet peeves

Marjorie Schejter

• Re: -=SGML=- summary
• Re: Poll: does spelling matter?

Mark D. Walker

• Midlife Job Search -Reply
• Re: Why kids can't write well -Reply
• Re: Why kids can't write well -Reply -Reply
• William Saffire's rules for writers -Reply
• Re: Usage of the word "thru" -Reply
• temperature-range style -Reply
• Re: temperature-range style -Reply -Reply
• Re: temperature-range style -Reply -Reply
• quick question needs a quick response, please -Reply
• Restricting Use of 'Engineer' -Reply
• in accordance with... -Reply
• Re: Pet Peeves -Reply

Mark Levinson

• Why paper books
• Why docs aren't tested
• Product names
• Standardized spelling
• Pulling my hair out
• All thru the nite
• haiku
• Correction
• phonetic spelling
• Value judgements about software
• Prior to - before - earlier
• Til
• In Depth

Marsha Wolicki

• Learning about SGML
• Bad writing
• SGML Courses in Israel
• Example of bad writing

Martes

• ??Tech Writing Seminar??
• Re: Why docs aren't tested

Mary Bull

• Re: Report on how kids can't write well

Mary M. Deaton

• New Help writers wanted

Matt Hicks

• Whoa! (was Re: Why paper books)
• Re: another bad manuscript
• Re: Pre-Norman profanity
• Re: weekend recreation
• Re: WinWord6 memory issues
• pulling out the hair of kids who can't write well
• Way off topic (was: Re: Educational reform)
• humor re: zen and the art of software documentation
• Re: Who can't write?
• Re: long sentences
• question Re: temperature-range style
• quick question needs a quick response, please
• thanks for many quick responses!
• more peeves
• Re: pet peeves
• Re: Pet Peeves

Matthew Wong

• Re: Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"

MCRJR

• [no subject]

MegaZone

• Re: Pulling my hair out
• Re: Poll: does spelling matter?

Michael C. Johnson

• Corel Draw equivalent for DOS

Michael Cooperman

• Re: one more business name

Michael Downs

• Re: Keye Seminars

Michael LaTorra

• Myths to live by

Michael R. Jones

• [no subject]
• Funny Business Names

Michele Berkes 615-576-2352

• humorous business names

Mick Taylor

• Please Unsubscribe me

Mike Christie

• Re; How Do You Use the WWW?
• Re: Metrics
• Headers

Mike Mcgraw

• "A very fresh fish here!"
• Would you trust these guys?

Mike Pope

• Re: &*%$ words
• Re: &*%$ words

mkale

• Re: Word for Mac
• You may
• Re: Why kids can't write well

Montgomery, Kevin

• Mil-Std-1379-D Training Prog. Dev. & Mgmt. Plan
• Funny Names
• Colored Pens

mpriestley

• Re: &*%$ words
• OS/2 Help WYSIWYG editor
• Re: Hobbe's Internet timeline
• Re: senseless drivel
• Re: You may
• Re: weekend recreation
• Re: Which form is correct?
• Re: WinWord6 memory issues
• Re: report on how kids can't write
• Educational reform
• Re: Educational reform
• Re: WinWord6 memory issues
• Waldorf education
• Way off topic
• Re: Building Help in Windows
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Arlen's comments
• Re: On use of the exclamation mark
• Re: more peeves

Nancy Hayes

• Re: Weird store names
• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• Re: Spelling survey
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"

nancy ott

• Who can't write?

Nancy S. Burns

• Style Guide

naomi (n.) bulka

• How well do we write?
• Re: another bad manuscript

Niall Johnson

• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• Re: More business names
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re: The Ideal Pen Color
• Re: Building Help in Windows
• UK work?
• Re: telephony

Nora Merhar

• Test
• Re: pulling out the hair of kids who can't write well
• Newsgroups
• Re: temperature-range style
• Re: Does Success Depend on Knowledge of What's Ahead?

Patricia J. Seymour

• Re: Bad Manuscripts

Patrick Duffy

• Re: #3(4) TECHWR-L Digest - ...

Patrick O'Connell

• Re: Hobbe's Internet timeline
• Re: Hobbe's Internet timeline
• More frighteningly ignorant signage
• Three cheers for good manners!

Patty

• Re: Plug for learning sentence structure
• Re: windows help

Paul R. Sawyer

• Re: reconditioned toner cartridges?

Paula Steinhart

• Re: pet peeves

Paula Zamarra

• TRAINING IN THE BOSTON AREA

Peggy Brown

• Hi!...Need advice on howto get started...
• Do you equate engineers and programmers?

Peggy Thompson

• "You may click" vs. "Click"

Peter Kasaty

• Re: reconditioned toner cartridges?

Phil Hellerman

• Documenting Applications Developed with PowerBuilder

Race, Paul

• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re: "thru"
• Re: quick question needs a quick response, please

ralph (r.f.) calistro

• spelling and other matters

Ram Bone

• Re: pet peeves

Ray Bruman x2325

• Re: help finding readability studies
• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: Why kids can't write well -Reply

Richard Frampton San Rafael California 415 472-3100 x3413

• Re: Searching for jobs... (Monthly Posting)
• Re: Docs not tested etc...

Richard Sobocinski

• -=SGML=- summary
• Process Documentation
• Re: More business names
• Rejected posting to TECHWR-L -at- OSUVM1
• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• SGML Training Courses available in San Diego
• Re: SGML Training Courses available in San Diego
• in accordance with...
• Re: pet peeves
• for Arlen
• Certification for Technical Communicators
• telephony

richard...gvg tech writing ... MS 4F ... X4027

• windows help

Rick Lippincott

• Degrees F/C Conversion
• MS/Tech Writing Programs
• Thermometer spelling

Robert E. Allen

• Re: &*%$ words
• Re: anther bad manuscript
• Re: Pulling my hair out
• Re: Plug for learning sentence structure
• Funny Business name, but vulgar
• Re: spelling- just do it!
• I like thru
• Stress-relief editing on a Fri afternoon

Robert W. Jones

• Re: Software documentatio
• IBM Lay Off?
• Re: invalid
• Re: Does Success Depend on Knowledge of What's Ahead?

Rod Hester

• Re: PULLING OUT THE HAIR OF KIDS WHO

roddie rabalais

• [no subject]

Roland Nord

• STC Region 6 Technical Communication Conference

Rollings, Gill

• Re: Engineers, Computer Scientists and Programmers
• Re: Pet peeves
• Re: Doctors, Engineers, Jargon, etc

Saeed Khan

• Software Packages
• Bad Manuscripts
• ScreenShots
• Docs not tested etc...
• Re: Docs not tested etc...
• Re: Re[2]: Docs not tested etc...

Sally Marquigny

• Re: Which form is correct?
• Re: pulling out the hair of kids who can't write well
• Re: re. Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: Why kids can't write well -Reply
• Re: Pulling my hair out
• Re: Usage of the word "thru" -Reply
• Re: pet peeves

Segal, Betty S.

• English/english
• ellipses
• Oops---Sorry
• Ellipses

Shannon Ford - Technical Writer

• occupational hazards

Sharon Toll

• Re: Why docs aren't tested
• Re: Poll: does spelling matter?
• Pet Peeves

Shelley Larock

• bad manuscripts (sort of)
• Re: Bad Manuscripts
• bad manuscripts
• Business Names
• Re: "You may click" vs. "Click"
• A serious question
• Where's Terri Rubin?
• Grad School Summary
• Re: Metrics
• Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: Who can't write?
• Teaching kids to write well
• Re: Who can't write?
• temp. ranges
• The Ideal Pen Color
• Re: a question or two
• Equating engineers w/ anyone else.
• Thru or through
• Re: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Does Success Depend on Knowledge of What's Ahead?
• New email address

Siang Lin Liem

• Re: Business Names

Sometimes there just aren't enough rocks

• Digital Style Guide
• Re: Building Help and Thru

sread

• Re: Tech. Writing out of US

st20c

• Re: weekend recreation

Stan Potts

• Silly business names

Steve Fouts

• YABM!*
• Re: How do You use the WWW?
• Bad Manuscripts
• Re: metrics
• Bad Initialisms
• Re: Where to start?
• The Churchill Wit
• Re: The Ideal Pen Color
• Re: reconditioned toner cartridges?

Steve Goodman

• Re: one more business name
• STC National Address please?
• Anyone know "Knowledge Transfer" (nee DDI)?

Steve Pope

• SGML, LISP programming

Steven Goldberg

• Job Search

Sue Gier, JMU Computing Support (703)568-6301

• Writing Contracts

Sue MacIntosh

• Re: Pre-Norman profanity
• Rejection letter

SuePStewrt

• Root for the ...
• CBT Summary
• Re: pet peeves
• Re: pet peeves
• Re: reconditioned toner cartridges?

Susan Stewart

• help finding readability studies

Sushil Oswal

• environmental communication in industry

Tammy Williams

• Need address for Mom a Homeschooler

TECH Consulting

• Technical Writers Needed At Short Notice - Northern NJ

technicalwriter

• Re: temperature-range style -Reply

Terance McNinch

• SHELLY LAROCK respond
• Building Help in Windows

Tim Carlson

• Overseas contract tech writing

Tim Pera

• senseless drivel

TIM_CLARK_at_PO . JADE

• Residents of Central Florida

Tina Sansom

• Re: A matter of degree
• ok, more pet peeves

Tom Bayston Jr.

• Re: Myths to live by

Tom Kohn

• Data and signal interface docs

Tom Parker [Consultant]

• Re: Searching for jobs... (Monthly Posting)

Tracey Showalter

• Thanks for Help with Canvas
• Re: this list and disappeari
• About that Usage Guide
• Business Names

Typo? What tpyo? 07-Aug-1994 1054

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Aug 1994 to 6 Aug 1994

Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster

• Re: Metrics

Unknown

• [no subject]
• Returned mail: Host unknown

USA::MU17692

• Job available in RTP, NC area
• STC Region 2 Conference: Oct. 29, 1994
• Looking for a job in North Carolina
• "thru"
• Certification for Technical Communicators

Usability Expertise Center ph.603.881.2430

• Docs DO NOT have to be done to test them!

V J Woolnough

• Techwr-l Teleworking

Valerie Archambeau

• Re: anther bad manuscript

Vicki Rosenzweig

• Re: Poll: does spelling matter?
• Re: Who can't write?
• Re: Value judgements about software
• Re: pet peeves

Virginia Krenn

• Re: Poll: does spelling matter?
• Re[2]: Report on how kids can't write well
• Re[2]: re. Report on how kid
• Re: Writing guidelines
• Re[2]: Why paper books
• Re: Colored Pens
• Re[2]: Do you equate engineers and programmers?
• Re: Pet Peeves

Vollbach, Elizabeth

• Does Success Depend on Knowledge of What's Ahead?
• More on the Exclamation Mark
• Duh?
• Arlen
• For Arlen because I can't get his address to work right

WandaJane Phillips

• Re: Testing to Ensure Accuracy of Inform
• Re: usability testing list?
• Re: Why docs aren't tested

Westra, Kayla L.

• Re: Another nickel's worth
• Re: Internet, internet, or InterNet?
• Re: Why docs aren't tested
• Re: Why doc aren't tested
• Re: Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: Pulling My Hair Out
• Re: Business names and bad writing
• Re: re. Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: Business names
• Re: report on how kids can't write
• Re: re. Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: Why kids can't write well
• Re: re. Report on how kid
• Re: Breaking in (was Re: Computer jobs for liberal arts majors?)
• Re: Hi!...Need advice on howto get started...
• Re: Report on how kids can't write well
• Re: Usage of the word "thru"
• Re: Plug for learning sentence structure
• Re: temperature-range style
• Re: long sentences
• Re: quick question needs a quick response, please
• Re: Rejection (aka "ding") letters
• Re: UK work?
• Re: Through wins over thru
• Re: pet peeves
• Re: Arlen's comments
• Re: Does Success Depend on Knowledge of What's Ahead?

---

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

---

---