TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive April 2002

1823 messages

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

Madhavan M

• WebHelp Files Shipment
• "and" Usage
• question related to grammar

Alan Alda

• "Click on" or "click"
• Screenshot degradation when copying from Word
• Re: Screenshot degradation when copying from Word

Alan Salo

• RE: help on bidding a job

Alfred P M

• Image formats

Allan Rothenberg

• WORD Hyperlinks with Screen Tips going to PDF files

Amanda Nance

• trends in instructional design

Andreas Ternes

• AW: Tales from the "_ _ _ crypt"
• AW: Translator rates

Andrew Broman

• RE: "late arriving" or "late-arriving?"
• RE: What to use when analyzing text?
• Re(2): Font Selection Methodology
• RE: Re(3): Font Selection Methodology

Andrew Dugas

• RE: Telecommuting
• RE: Job advice
• RE: WebWorks Publisher - Customization
• Acrobat 5.0 bug???
• RE: Acrobat 5.0 bug???

Andrew Plato

• Re: (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• Re: Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP
• Re: outlook or xchange forms
• HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• My Lame STC Thing: Bidding & Estimating Contract & Reelance Projects
• Re: new job, delicacy required?
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: STC blackmail? (Was: Humor... sort of)
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: STC blackmail?
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Job advice
• Re: Consultant Questions
• RE: Font Selection Methodology
• RE: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: The Problem With Fonts (RE: Font Selection Methodology)
• RE: Consultant Questions
• Re: Ready to Scream
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: And you wonder why people lurk...
• Re: The Problem With Fonts (RE: Font Selection Methodology)
• Goodbye TECHWR-L

Anita Legsdin

• RE: Why lurk
• RE: on being a lurker
• RE: maximize, minimize, and Windows
• RE: Numbering in Word

Ann Hastings

• Re: when is it right to be wrong?
• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Book on Standard Operating Procedures & Policies?
• Cultivate curiosity as part of information design (Was: A trip to IKEA)

Ann Waterhouse

• FW: Click or click on

Annamaria Profit

• Budget_technology
• Gigalaw.com Resource
• Re: Big Word Docs?
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• RE: STC Conference Time - )
• Re: Tech Writing: The Next Generation
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: when is it right to be wrong?
• Re: Tales from the "_ _ _ crypt"
• Re: Time to perform a procedure
• WORD issue solved
• Re: departing from a template
• Re: Patents on tech writing techniques?
• RE: Largest Word File Size
• MAC Attack
• Short Phrases
• Re: Short Phrases
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• I-Net Language Dictionary
• Warning - Correction
• Bookmarks Manager
• Re: Need some disclaimer text
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates
• Re: Jobs in the NJ pharmaceutical market
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates

Annamarie Pluhar

• Question: Scripts for automating file renames and updating links
• Re: Consultant Questions

anne_mcdonough

• RE: SDLC and role of Tech.Writers

Anonymous

• FWD: Are There Any Transsexual Technical Writers Out There?

Anthony

• Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP
• Practical Limits of Files Size in MS Word

Antonio Fante

• Translator rates
• Translation query: Thank you
• Researcher vs writing rates
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates

aoslick

• SDLC and the role of Tech.Writer
• SDLC and the role of the Tech.Writer - proper credit

Arlen . P . Walker

• Re: Word Processing File Conversion Software
• Re: Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• Re: Conferences: Valuable? Or the Spawn of Satan?
• RE: STC blackmail?
• Re: Pros and Cons of HTML tools
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Order of Magnitude
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• General typography concerns
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re: General typography concerns

aschiff

• Re: trends in instructional design

ASUE Tekwrytr

• lurkers and lurking
• Goodbye Andrew?

B Herring

• Job Switch

Badrinarayanan_Srinivasan

• RE: Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?
• RE: "and" Usage
• RE: Best Practise

Ballenberger Gerd

• AW: Putting tips/notes within a numbered list

Barb Einarsen

• RE: names for doc statuses
• RE: PDF QUESTION

Barbara Yanez

• Minutia(e)?
• RE: Minutia(e)?
• RE: Minutia(e)?
• RE: Acrobat 5.0 bug???
• Tif and Tiff

Barry Batorsky

• Re: interesting article about the perils of venting online

Barry Thistlethwaite

• Publish 400+ Excel Spreadsheets?

Bart Windrum

• Re: Writer/Coder ratio and other workload assessments

Becca Price

• charging for the "commuting" part of telecommuting?

Beilby, Margaret

• RE: Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP
• RE: Maximize and Minimize

Ben Kovitz

• A trip to IKEA
• Re: diagrams
• Re: A trip to IKEA
• Re: Order of Magnitude
• Re: Order of Magnitude
• Re: Cultivate curiosity as part of information design (Was: A trip to IKEA)
• Re: Pretentious writing (was Re: Order of Magnitude)
• Pitfalls of researching esoteric terminology
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates
• Re: "Guide" vs. "Guidelines"

Benjamin J.

• Maximize and Minimize
• Re: Maximize and Minimize

Bernd Hutschenreuther

• Friggin dictionary
• Directions for tomorrow's techwriting

Beth Friedman

• Re: Printing From WORD
• Re: Tales from the "_ _ _ crypt"
• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: Acrobat 5.0 bug???

Bill Buckheit

• RE: Tech Writing for Seniors
• Re: Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• Re: STC blackmail?
• Re: WORD issue solved and lurking
• Re: Labels for portions of tech drawings
• Re: charging for the "commuting" part of telecommuting? or business travel
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards

Bill Burns

• RE: Multi lingual Online Help
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• RE: FramemakerSGML --> Webworks --> HTML - mappings question

Bill Hall

• Techwriter's toolkits and "application holy wars"
• Re: Techwriter's toolkits and "application holy wars"
• Re: Techwriter's toolkits and "application holy wars"
• Re: Is KM a Fad - It depends on whether you capitalise it!
• Re: Techwriter's toolkits and "application holy wars"
• Re: Techwriter's toolkits and directions for tomorrow (long and deep response)

Bill Wild

• FrameMaker 5.5 Issue (Finding Strings/Fonts)
• Word Processing File Conversion Software
• RoboHelp and Netscape
• WebWorks Publisher - Customization

Bob Hooker

• Geoff Hart's My Hero

BobR

• RE: UNIX and Windows documentation
• RE: UNIX and Windows documentation
• Who needs or uses technical writers?

Bonnie Granat

• Re: "Click on" or "click"
• Re: If you were going to learn...
• Re: "late arriving" or "late-arriving?"
• Re: Minutia(e)?
• Re: Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• Re: Playing nicely with Bobby
• Re: Playing nicely with Bobby
• Re: Tweaking English in manuals and localisation
• Re: I feel like I am once again in the wrong profession
• Re: Anyone using Wiki for collaboration?
• Re: Anyone using Wiki for collaboration?
• Re: Cases where bad documentation caused accidents or worse
• Re: Tech Writing Question
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• Question about sending one's resume to companies
• Re: Question about sending one's resume to companies
• Re: Where to get MIL-M-15071

Brad

• Freaky FrameMaker Files
• Freaky Frame Files

Brad Jensen

• Re: techwr-l digest: March 30, 2002
• Re: (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• Re: outlook or xchange forms
• Re: TW salaries in B.C. -- LONG
• Re: re "check" the box (was RE: "Click on" or "click")
• Re: re "check" the box (was RE: "Click on" or "click")
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• Re: when is it right to be wrong?
• Re: when is it right to be wrong?
• Re: Tech Writing for Seniors
• Re: Image formats
• Re: Why don't technical writer's do case studies?
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Consultant Questions
• Re: Context sensitive help implementation?
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• Re: Geoff Hart's My Hero
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L - Warning - Correction
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Re: A trip to IKEA
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• Re: Of Terms and 'Tudes
• Re: Who needs or uses technical writers?

Brad Mehlenbacher

• CFP: ACM SIGDOC Grad. Student Competition

brenda . stewart

• Standard Operating Procedures

Brian Hooper

• Re: Job advice

Bruce Byfield

• Re: "Click on" or "click"
• Re: UNIX and Windows documentation
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: TW salaries in B.C. -- LONG
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: STC conference redux
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: White Papers
• Re: White Papers
• Re: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• Re: STC blackmail?
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Re: Contracting confusion/frustration
• Re: Emphasising text techniques
• Re: Emphasising text techniques
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Fonts in a new direction
• Re: New TECHWR-L Question
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Maximize and Minimize
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: departing from a template
• Re: A Simple Philosophy
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)
• Re: Techwriter's toolkits and "application holy wars"
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• Re: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• Re: General typography concerns
• Re: Best Practise
• Re: Question about sending one's resume to companies
• Re: Question about sending one's resume to companies
• Re: Question about sending one's resume to companies

Bruce Wolf

• Re: Researcher vs writing rates

bryan . westbrook

• RE: "Click on" or "click"
• RE: "Click on" or "click"
• RE: "Click on" or "click"
• RE: (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• RE: Subject: Re: (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• STC Question (was: STC Conference Time!)
• RE: standard time estimates for documentation projects
• RE: STC blackmail?
• RE: STC blackmail?
• RE: STC blackmail?
• RE: STC blackmail?
• RE: Playing nicely with Bobby
• RE: STC blackmail?
• Lone Writers at Large Companies
• RE: STC blackmail?
• RE: Playing nicely with Bobby
• RE: Lone writers at large companies?
• RE: Lone Writers at Large Companies
• RE: Why don't technical writers do case studies?
• RE: Starting Out
• RE: Training seminar feedback?
• RE: Recommendations for a charting tool?
• RE: Scanners with Optical Character Recognition (OCR)
• RE: Job Switch
• RE: Yahoo E-mail Bounce-backs

Bulloch, Scott

• RE: What is an LDL file?

Carey Jennifer (Cry)

• RE: Why don't technical writer's do case studies?
• RE: Telecommuting
• RE: Why don't technical writer's do case studies?
• RE: Time to perfom a procedure
• RE: Time to perfom a procedure
• RE: departing from a template
• Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?
• RE: Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?
• RE: SDLC and role of Tech.Writers
• RE: Identify help tool used to create help
• RE: Lurking

Carma Allen

• Re: STC Question (was: STC Conference Time!)

CarolAnne . Wall

• RE: STC blackmail?
• RE: STC blackmail?

Carolee Burgess

• Why lurkers lurk
• RE: Font selection methodology
• Essay on fonts and usability

Cass Sadek

• Re: Layout for test plans?

Cayenne Woods

• tools - acrobat 5 and doc-to-help
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting

CB Casper

• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Scope document?
• Consistent & Variable Information
• Re: Consistent & Variable Information
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards (metric)
• Re: Question about sending one's resume to companies

Char James-Tanny

• Re: Consultant Questions

Charles E Vermette

• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (Take II)
• Re: SDLC and role of Tech Writers
• Back in the Saddle...
• Re: Font Selection Methodology...
• Re: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting...

Charlie Ahern

• TOOLS: Track Project Time with Time Stamp
• BOOKS: Rapid Development-Taming Wild Software Schedules by Stveve McConnell

Chris

• Re: FrameMaker to HTML
• Re: Remote reviewers, document markup, FrameMaker?
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Anyone using Wiki for collaboration?

Chris Anderson

• RE: Big Word Docs?

Chris Gooch

• Re: Software that retrieves developer comments from code
• RE: Re: Software that retrieves developer comments from code
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting

Chris La Porte

• RE: new job, delicacy required?
• RE: Window Name

Christensen, Kent

• Re: charging for the "commuting" part of telecommuting
• re: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• Re: Inside the mind of a Lurker
• Too many words?
• RE: Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?
• re: Best Practices

CHRISTINE ANAMEIER

• Re:Image formats
• Re:"Interfacing": Jargon?
• Re: linking from HTML to bookmark within PDF?
• Re: Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• Re:Sometimes they make ya feel good
• Re:Inside the mind of a Lurker - a CNN Special Report (SUMMA
• Re: WORD issue solved
• Re: WORD issue solved
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• Re: Of Terms and 'Tudes
• Re:SOLVED:Characters overlapping in printed PDF

Christine Gonzales

• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• Looking for that survey on the elephant, giraffe, alligator.. in a refrigerator etc.

Consultcarver

• Word styles for future PDF doc

conyette

• poll taking: system documentation versus end user documentation

Cook, Jenise

• Re: Why lurkers lurk
• For the Sake of Newbies
• Re: For the Sake of Newbies
• Microsoft's Content Management Server
• Re: Yahoo E-mail Bounce-backs
• Revolution OS (Open Source movement documentary)

Curtis Brautigam

• I feel like I am once again in the wrong profession

Damien Braniff

• STC Conference Speakers
• Post-mortem (was RE: Why don't technical writers do case studies?)
• Frame/Illustrator Q
• The 'touchy-feely' customer
• Promoting good user docs - DIY
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• Re:Font Selection Methodology

Dan Hall

• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• FW: Font Selection Methodology
• RE: FW: Font Selection Methodology
• RE: WORD issue solved
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: A Simple Philosophy
• Of ridicule and personal attacks...
• RE: Tif and Tiff
• Multiple pdf's for different situations?

Dana Worley

• Re: Stand-up (was Re: Job Requirements (was Ethical Companies))
• Re: Help file basics - online resources?
• Re: Online Graduate Education
• Re: Sometimes they make ya feel good
• Re: Inside the mind of a Lurker
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• Re: Looking for that survey on the elephant, giraffe, alligator.. in ---a refrigerator etc.

Daniel K. Cunningham

• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Importance of XML in single sourcing?

Darren Barefoot

• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• RE: TW salaries in B.C. -- LONG

Dave Murray

• Re: Consistent & Variable Information

Dave Neufeld

• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• RE: My Lame STC Thing: Bidding & Estimating Contract & Reelance Projects
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L

David Brown

• Re: Emphasising text techniques?
• Re: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• Re: departing from a template
• Re: Comments lost from Word to PDF
• Re: Comments from Word to PDF

David Castro

• Re: Text shift when printing a CHM
• Conference speakers and free admission
• Colleges in NY?
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Job Switch
• Re: BOOKS: Rapid Development-Taming Wild Software Schedules by Stveve -- McConnell

David Downing

• Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• RE: on technical writers
• RE: on technical writers

David Knopf

• RE: Multi lingual Online Help
• RE: Screenshot degradation when copying from Word
• RE: Freaky FrameMaker Files
• RE: STC blackmail?
• RE: FrameMaker to HTML
• RE: Robohelp for Microsoft HTML Help OR Deva tools for Dreamweaver?
• RE: Importance of XML in single sourcing?
• RE: departing from a template
• RE: Interesting site for Help information
• RE: WebWorks Publisher - Customization

David Neeley

• Re: Network architecture diagrams
• Re: PDFMaker error
• Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• Re: Font selection methodology

David_Slonosky

• Re: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• Re: Pros and Cons of HTML tools
• Re: Importance of XML in single sourcing?
• Re: Salaries
• Re: GUI terms
• Re: JavaHelp and XML
• RE: Practical Limits of Files Size in MS Word

Dawn Whitlock

• Proposal Writer Sought By Tech Comm Student

Deborah S. Ray

• New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• Re: Roommate sought for STC-Conference (was RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time! - Ooops! Got long!)
• Re: Big Word Docs?
• Re: STC conference redux
• New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• Re: Conferences: Valuable? Or the Spawn of Satan?
• New TECHWR-L Question
• Re: Tech Writing Question
• New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• New TECHWR-L Poll Question

Dench, Neal

• RE: Tech Writing: The Next Generation

Diane Evans

• RE: new job, delicacy required?
• RE: Tech Writing for Seniors
• RE: Lone Writers at Large Companies
• RE: Starting Out
• RE: Job advice
• Word page numbering problem
• RE: Instruction Manual Help Request
• RE: Tech Writing Question
• RE: Cases where bad documentation...
• RE: Standards wrt paper and standards
• RE: Yahoo E-mail Bounce-backs
• RE: Searching for a Font.
• RE: Jobs in the NJ pharmaceutical market
• RE: Question about sending one's resume to companies

Dick Margulis

• Re: describing range - use of from/between
• Re: new job, delicacy required?
• Re: when is it right to be wrong?
• Re: inserting images into a pdf file
• Re: PDF to Word
• Re: in praise (was RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L)
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards

Dick Margulis

• Re: PDF QUESTION
• Re: (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• Re: Centralized document management and decentralized document creation
• Re: Printing From WORD
• Re: Image formats
• Re: Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• Re: Solution: locking Powerpoint files
• Re: Remote reviewers, document markup, FrameMaker
• Re: Emphasising text techniques?
• Re: Emphasising text techniques? (Take II)
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Re(2): Font Selection Methodology
• RE: Re(3): Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Frame/Illustrator Q
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Re(2): Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Re(2): Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• RE: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Cases where bad documentation caused accidents or worse
• Re: Order of Magnitude
• Re: Word styles for future PDF doc
• Re: Pretentious writing (was Re: Order of Magnitude)
• Re: Font Selection, Name Changes, and Fainting Goats
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates
• Re: Acrobat 5.0 bug???
• RE: Acrobat 5.0 bug???
• RE: Acrobat 5.0 bug???
• RE: Acrobat 5.0 bug???

dmbrown

• Re: Big Word Docs?
• Re: Big Word Docs?
• Re: Big Word Docs?
• Re: linking from HTML to bookmark within PDF?
• Re: Consistent & Variable Information
• Re: Consistent & Variable Information
• Re: "and" Usage
• TW rates (was "Jobs in the NJ pharmaceutical market")
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates
• Re: search engines
• Re: attaching word templates

doc_writer

• re: Best Practices

Donal McCarthy

• search engines

Doug Grossman

• RE: Comments lost from Word to PDF
• Of Terms and 'Tudes
• RE: Of Terms and 'Tudes

Douglas S. Bailey (AL)

• Re: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• Re: "Interfacing": Jargon?
• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers

Drew Adams

• "check" the box (was RE: "Click on" or "click")

dthomps

• RE: Tech Writing Question

Dynamic Document eDesign

• Robohelp for Microsoft HTML Help OR Deva tools for Dreamweaver?
• Winword.exe error in Robohelp

Earl Cooley

• RE: Removing all embedded style information in HTML files
• RE: Friggin dictionary
• RE: standard time estimates for documentation projects
• RE: Why don't technical writer's do case studies?
• RE: Pros and Cons of HTML tools
• RE: Font Selection Methodology
• RE: Font Selection Methodology
• RE: Fonts in a new direction
• RE: Fonts in a new direction
• RE: "Repurpose" in PDF?
• RE: Short Phrases
• RE: on technical writers
• RE: Jobs in the NJ pharmaceutical market
• RE: Question about sending one's resume to companies

ebarker

• Importance of XML in single sourcing?

EbonyEyes1968

• Re: I feel like I am once again in the wrong profession

EBoulet

• Automatically populating fields on a PDF form
• RE: UML?

Ed

• White Papers

Ed Gregory

• RE: Big Word Docs?
• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• RE: Quick start guide: electronic or paper?
• RE: Lone Writers at Large Companies
• Pros and Cons of HTML tools
• RE: Pros and Cons of HTML tools
• RE: departing from a template
• FW: Salaries
• FP to DW Tutorials
• Re: Numbering in Word
• Re: Question about sending one's resume to companies

Ed T

• Re: techwr-l digest: April 08, 2002

Ednie, Catherine

• names for doc statuses
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers

Edwin Wurster

• Re: Anyone using Wiki for collaboration?
• Re: Bookmarks Manager
• Back in the Saddle

Elaine Malfas

• RE: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology

Elisabeth Zakes

• RE: Window Name

elizabeth mathew

• Multi lingual Online Help

Ellen Lidington

• RE: "Click on" or "click"

Ellen P. Urmson

• RE: F1 vs. Shift+F1
• What's This? Help macro

Ellen Vanrenen

• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: I feel like I am once again in the wrong profession
• departing from a template
• templates and contents
• Largest Word File Size
• Thank you - on templates and size of Word files
• RE: lurkers and lurking
• Another screenshot question
• RE: Another screenshot question
• Word Style Organizer

Emily Berk

• Re: White Papers
• Re: charging for the "commuting" part of telecommuting?
• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)
• Re: charging for the "commuting" part of telecommuting? or business travel
• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)

Emma . Cuthbert

• Salaries
• .NET and javadoc (SIDELINE FROM: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting)

Erb, Isis

• RE: Tech Writing for Seniors
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers

eric . dunn

• RE: WORD issue solved
• Re: Maximize and Minimize
• The Problem With Fonts (RE: Font Selection Methodology)
• Re: Short Phrases
• Re: The Problem With Fonts (RE: Font Selection Methodology)

Eric J. Ray

• Re: Anyone using Wiki for collaboration?
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L (fwd)
• ADMIN: Rules

Erika Yanovich

• RE: Centralized document management and decentralized document cr eation
• RE: Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP?
• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• RE: Paper documentation vs. online help?
• RE: Instruction Manual Help Request
• Mapping PDF to HTML (was: Paper documentation vs. online help?)
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• RE: Researcher vs writing rates

Erin Cullingham

• Re:Style Guide vs. GUI terminology

etymes -at- lts -dot- com

• Re: Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP?
• Investing in the Future
• Re: Tech Writing for Seniors
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• The Recession's Effects on Tech Industries
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• Re: Job Switch
• Re: Consistent & Variable Information
• Re: Best Practise

EXT-Kathleen.Melly

• Word to PDF - No links

Farwell, Peter

• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting

Fiona Hurley

• JavaHelp and XML

Foster, Willow

• RE: And you wonder why people lurk...
• RE: lurkers and lurking

Fred Sampson

• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers

Gay Reed

• RE: "check" the box

Geetha Raghavan

• Re: GUI terms

Geoff Purchase

• How to tell your Word training session was successful...
• PDF to Word
• RE: Standards wrt paper and standards

Gilger.John

• RE: Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP
• RE: when is it right to be wrong?
• RE: Tales from the "_ _ _ crypt"
• Telecommuting
• RE: Recommendations for a charting tool?
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• RE: Job Cuts - Telecom

Giordano, Connie

• RE: Who's the User? (You're the user!)
• RE: Ready to Scream
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting

Goober TechComm

• Re: Screenshot degradation when copying from Word
• Re: Screenshot degradation when copying from Word
• Re: Acrobat Reader Language Change
• Re: SUMMARY: Metaphors for technical communicators
• RE: Tech Writing for Seniors (and Communication)
• Re: What to use when analyzing text?
• RE: STC blackmail?
• Re: The Recession's Effects on Tech Industries
• Re: Consultant Questions
• RE: WORD issue solved
• RE: TW rates (was "Jobs in the NJ pharmaceutical market")
• Re: Best Practise
• Re: Best Practise

Gordon Graham

• RE: STC blackmail?

greg . hamill

• Re: techwr-l digest: April 09, 2002
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Tech Writing Question
• Re: Order of Magnitude

Haas, Guy

• RE: UNIX and Windows documentation
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• RE: STC blackmail? (Was: Humor... sort of)
• RE: STC blackmail? (Was: Humor... sort of)
• RE: New TECHWR-L Question
• RE: The Recession's Effects on Tech Industries
• An interesting page....
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• RE: Salary surveys?

Hack HackMan

• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: The Recession's Effects on Tech Industries

HALL Bill

• RE: White Papers
• RE: White Papers
• RE: document/content management software
• Cases where bad documentation caused accidents or worse
• Re: Techwriter's toolkits and directions for tomorrow

Harold B. Gill

• Roommate sought for STC-Conference (was RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time! - Ooops! Got long!)
• RE: Book Recommendation: (was Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?)
• RE: Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?

Hart, Geoff

• Can I quote you?
• Centralized document management and decentralized document creati on?
• Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP?
• Putting tips/notes within a numbered list?
• Describing range - use of from/between?
• STC conference redux
• When is it right to be wrong?
• RE: CHAT: Edinburgh get-together
• White papers?
• Colour representation of values, how to describe?
• White papers? (Take II)
• Tech writing for seniors?
• STC blackmail? (Was: Humor... sort of)
• Minutia(e)?
• Conferences: Valuable? Or the Spawn of Satan?
• Audience evaluation?
• Tech. reviewers who copy edit?
• User guide vs. quick start guide?
• Use of screenshots?
• Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Planning (was: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?)
• Lone writers at large companies?
• Lone writers at large companies? (take II)
• Why don't technical writer's do case studies?
• Remote reviewers, document markup, FrameMaker?
• Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (Take II)
• Telecommuting?
• Emphasising text techniques?
• Emphasising text techniques? (Take II)
• Tweaking English in manuals and localisation?
• Tools: Powerpoint utilities
• Emphasising text techniques? (Take II)
• Time to perfom a procedure?
• Style guide vs. GUI terminology?
• "Repurpose" in PDF?
• Recommendations for a charting tool?
• Labels for portions of tech drawings?
• Paper documentation vs. online help?
• Instruction manual help request?
• Context sensitive help implementation?
• Tech writing question (specs)

Hart, Rowena

• RE: TW salaries in B.C.
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers

Helen Ho (TES)

• RE: Window Name

hvonmark

• Looking for Tech Note Samples

Ian Ferguson

• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers

Ilona Lehmann

• document/content management software
• RE: document/content management software (summary)
• converting RoboHelp project to D2H

jan . howarth . b

• missing/mishappen graphics in RoboHelp printed doc version

Jan C. Wright

• Re: techwr-l digest: April 04, 2002
• Re: techwr-l digest: April 08, 2002

Jan Henning

• Re: "Click on" or "click"
• Re(2): "Click on" or "click"
• Re(2): "Click on" or "click"
• Re: (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• Re: UNIX and Windows documentation
• Re(2): (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• Re(2): HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: Quick start guide: electronic or paper?
• Re: Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• Re: FrameMaker to HTML
• Re: Translator rates
• Re(2): Font Selection Methodology
• Re(4): Font Selection Methodology
• Re(5): Font Selection Methodology
• Re(3): Font Selection Methodology
• Re(2): Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• Re(2): Font Selection Methodology
• Re(2): Font Selection Methodology
• Re(2): Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• Re(2): Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re(2): Practical Limits of Files Size in MS Word
• Re: Mac Pagemaker to PC Acrobat?
• Re: Window Name
• Re(2): Window Name
• Re: Screenshot resolution query, with apologies

Jane Carnall

• RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• interesting article about the perils of venting online
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• CHAT: Edinburgh get-together
• RE: white papers and such
• RE: STC blackmail? (Was: Humor... sort of)
• RE: STC (was: STC blackmail?)
• RE: Why don't technical writers do case studies?
• RE: Training seminar feedback?
• short attention span (was Re: Maximize and Minimize)
• RE: Font Selection Methodology
• RE: And you wonder why people lurk...
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• RE: Cases where bad documentation caused accidents or worse
• in praise (was RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L)
• RE: Pitfalls of researching esoteric terminology
• RE: Job Cuts - Telecom
• RE: Of Terms and 'Tudes
• RE: lurkers and lurking
• RE: Who needs or uses technical writers?
• RE: Style Guide
• RE: TW rates (was "Jobs in the NJ pharmaceutical market")
• RE: Question about sending one's resume to companies

Janet Murphy

• Re: Order of Magnitude

Janet Myers

• Re: Tech Writing for Seniors

Janice Gelb

• Re: "Click on" or "click"
• RE: UNIX and Windows documentation
• Re: How prevalent is DocBook?
• Re: when is it right to be wrong?
• Re: "Interfacing": Jargon?
• Re: Advice needed on a wording choice, please
• Re: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• Re: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• Re: Maximize and Minimize
• Re: departing from a template

Jason Willebeek-LeMair

• RE: Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• RE: Why people lurk...
• Font Selection, Name Changes, and Fainting Goats
• RE: Font Selection, Name Changes, and Fainting Goats

Jean Hollis Weber

• Re: Big Word Docs?
• Re: "check" the box (was RE: "Click on" or "click")
• Re: PDFMaker error
• RE: But seriously now folks ...
• Re: PDF extraction bug
• Re: Tech. reviewers who copy edit?
• Re: help on bidding a job
• Re: charging for the "commuting" part of telecommuting?
• Re: Comments from Word to PDF
• Re: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• RE: Standards wrt paper and standards (metric)
• Re: Numbering in Word
• Re: Style Guide

Jean Richardson

• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• RE: STC blackmail? (Was: Humor... sort of)
• RE: Audience Evaluation

Jeanne A. E. DeVoto

• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)
• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)

Jeff Allen

• SUMMARY (part 2): Project plan risk assessment / risk analysis / risk management
• SUMMARY (part 1): Project plan risk assessment / risk analysis / risk management
• Solution: locking Powerpoint files

Jennifer Itatani

• PDFMaker error
• RE: PDFMaker error
• RE: PDFMaker error--Thanks!

Jennifer Maitland

• paper documentation vs. online help
• context sensitive help implementation
• diagrams
• UML?
• Re: lurkers and lurking (my 2 pence)
• Robohelp Office 2002

Jennifer O'Neill

• Tweaking English in manuals and localisation

Jennifer Westerberg

• RE: Tech Writers on GUI Design Teams

Jenny Megale

• Web based training
• Consultant Questions

Jeremiah Gardner

• TWs at corporate universities

Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai

• Re: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re: lurkers and lurking

jgarison

• RE: "Click on" or "click"
• But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• RE: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• RE: STC blackmail? (Was: Humor... sort of)
• RE: New TECHWR-L Question
• Interesting site for Help information
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• RE: search engines

Jim Morgan

• Re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• Re: Screenshots in hotspots: a good idea?
• Re: Scope document?

Jim Shaeffer

• RE: re "check" the box (was RE: "Click on" or "click")
• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• RE: Telecommuting
• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant )
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• RE: lurkers and lurking
• RE: Who needs or uses technical writers?
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• RE: Word Style Organizer
• RE: Robohelp Office 2002
• RE: Writer "levels"

JItatani

• PDFMaker error

jnkajkowski

• re: Planning (was: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so craz y?)

Jo Francis Byrd

• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Re: Formatting a plain-text resume (kinda long)
• Re: I feel like I am once again in the wrong profession
• Re: Yahoo E-mail Bounce-backs
• Re: Robohelp Office 2002

Joe

• Window vs. embedded help
• "Guide" vs. "Guidelines"
• Re: System/Architecture Documents

Joe Campo

• Re: Multi lingual Online Help

Joe Sokohl

• RE: Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP

johanne . cadorette

• Re: "check" the box (was RE: "Click on" or "click")
• Re: Who's the User? (You're the user!)
• Re: when is it right to be wrong?
• "Interfacing": Jargon?
• Re: "Interfacing": Jargon?
• Re: departing from a template
• Re: Job Switch
• Re: Font Selection, Name Changes, and Fainting Goats
• Re: Font Selection, Name Changes, and Fainting Goats
• Characters overlapping in printed PDF
• SOLVED:Characters overlapping in printed PDF

John Cornellier

• The non technical, tech writers WAS Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• colour representation of values, how to describe?
• Re: Question: Scripts for automating file renames and updating links
• Re: Tweaking English in manuals and localisation
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Patents on tech writing techniques?

John Fleming

• Re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• Re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• Re: Font Selection Methodology
• RE: Netiquette
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates
• RE: Office XP 2002 and PowerPoint Upgrade?
• Re: Windows 2000 Professional vs Windows XP Professional

John Mathew

• Difference in writing styles of User Manuals, Online Help, Printed Documentation, etc.

John Posada

• Re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
• Re: Stand-up (was Re: Job Requirements (was Ethical Companies))
• Re: PDF QUESTION
• Centralized document management and decentralized document creation
• Re: UNIX and Windows documentation
• Re: UNIX and Windows documentation
• RE: UNIX and Windows documentation
• Re: Printing From WORD
• RE: Centralized document management and decentralized document creation
• RE: Internet Architecture Project - PLEASE HELP
• Checking links in Word
• Re: What? My first outline wasn't perfect?
• Re: when is it right to be wrong?
• Re: new job, delicacy required?
• Re: White papers?
• Re: What to use when analyzing text?
• Re: standard time estimates for documentation projects
• Re: standard time estimates for documentation projects
• Re: Pros and Cons of HTML tools
• Re: Pros and Cons of HTML tools
• Re: Formatting a plain-text resume (kinda long)
• RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Definition of "control structures"?
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Time to perfom a procedure
• Re: Time to perfom a procedure
• re: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• Re: Instruction Manual Help Request
• re: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• RE: Style Guide vs. GUI terminology
• Re: Salaries
• RE: A Simple Philosophy
• RE: Tech Writing Question
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L - Warning
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L - Warning - Correction
• The off-color email
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• Re: Job Switch
• RE: Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?
• RE: Software User Guide as Specifications Doc - Anyone tried it?
• Re: lurkers and lurking
• RE: lurkers and lurking
• Re: Font Selection, Name Changes, and Fainting Goats
• Status of the job market in NJ-an observation
• Re: Font Selection, Name Changes, and Fainting Goats
• Status of the job market in NJ-an observation
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• Re: Looking for that survey on the elephant, giraffe, alligator.. in a refrigerator etc.
• re: Question about sending one's resume to companies
• Re: re Question about sending one's resume to companies

Jonathan Stoppi

• TW salaries in B.C.
• When Programmers Design Web Pages
• White papers
• RE: STC (was: STC blackmail?)
• Making better standards
• Tech Writers on GUI Design Teams
• Re: Publish 400+ Excel Spreadsheets?

Jonathan West

• RE: Word Processing File Conversion Software
• RE: Centralized document management and decentralized document creation
• RE: Checking links in Word
• RE: Big Word Docs?
• Re: Question: Scripts for automating file renames and updating links
• Making better standards
• Re: Software for extracting Office Document Properties
• RE: help on bidding a job
• RE: Word page numbering problem
• RE: Largest Word File Size
• RE: Comments lost from Word to PDF
• RE: Tech Writing Question
• Re: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• Signal to noise ratio
• RE: Standards wrt paper and standards (metric)
• RE: Researcher vs writing rates

Joyce Fetterman

• TOOLS: Dreamweaver crashes
• TOOLS: DW crashes, part 2
• TOOLS: resolving DW4 crashes

jrondeau

• new job, delicacy required?
• Fonts in a new direction
• Screenshot resolution query, with apologies

JS Qualum

• Re: charging for the "commuting" part of telecommuting?

Julie & Darryl Shannon

• RE: telecommuting -- keep it balanced
• Thanks for the note about the useful app Time Stamp, Charlie!

Justin Ressler

• RE: Tech Writing for Seniors (and Communication)
• RE: Why don't technical writers do case studies?
• RE: Job advice
• RE: WORD issue solved
• RE: WORD issue solved
• RE: relocation question
• RE: And you wonder why people lurk...
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L
• Searching for a Font.
• Numbering in Word
• Searching for a Font - RESOLVED
• Office XP 2002 and PowerPoint Upgrade?

Kane, Beth

• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: Tech Writing Question

Karen Casemier

• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: Directions for tomorrow's techwriting
• RE: Question about sending one's resume to companies

Karen E. Black

• Definition of "control structures"?
• RE: Font Selection Methodology
• Needed: one-liners in response to ...
• RE: SDLC and role of Tech.Writers
• Re: A trip to IKEA
• Re: Who needs or uses technical writers?

Karen L. Zorn

• Acrobat Reader Language Change
• Re: Tech Writing Question--Specs

karen_otto

• RE: Salaries
• Re: Best Practise

Karenm

• Re: Comments from Word to PDF

Karin Heroux

• Lone Writers at Large Companies

Karla Saari Kitalong

• RE: Why don't technical writers do case studies?

Karthik Sundaram

• Best Practise

Kat Nagel

• Re: Crisis
• Re: STC Question (was: STC Conference Time!)
• RE: Tech Writing for Seniors
• Re: AW: Tales from the "_ _ _ crypt"
• Re: STC blackmail?
• Re: Translator rates
• Re: Consultant Questions
• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Winword.exe error in Robohelp
• Re: Tech Writing Question
• Re: Tech Writing Question--Specs
• Netiquette
• Re: Standards wrt paper and standards
• Re: Researcher vs writing rates
• RE: Yahoo E-mail Bounce-backs

kate

• What? My first outline wasn't perfect?
• Re: What? My first outline wasn't perfect?
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy?
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Experiences with XP?
• Re: Patents on tech writing techniques?
• Re: Patents on tech writing techniques?

Kathy Jacobs

• RE: techwr-l digest: March 30, 2002

Kathy Mizell

• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: Job Switch

Katie Kearns

• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Order of Magnitude

Kay Ethier

• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!

kcronin

• (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: But seriously now folks ... (was HUMOR: STC Conference Time - )
• Re: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: STC Conference Speakers
• Re: Tech Writing: The Next Generation
• RE: HUMOR: STC Conference Time!
• Re: What? My first outline wasn't perfect?
• Re: My Lame STC Thing: Bidding & Estimating Contract & Reelance Projects
• Conferences: Valuable? Or the Spawn of Satan?
• RE: standard time estimates for documentation projects
• Re: Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• Re: Tech. reviewers who copy edit
• Re: inserting images into a pdf file
• Playing nicely with Bobby
• RE: Pros and Cons of HTML tools
• Formatting a plain-text resume (kinda long)
• Re: Formatting a plain-text resume (kinda long)
• Re: Telecommuting
• Re: Telecommuting
• Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• Re: New TECHWR-L Question
• Inside the mind of a Lurker - a CNN Special Report (SUMMARY)
• RE: WORD issue solved
• RE: WORD issue solved
• RE: WORD issue solved
• RE: WORD issue solved
• Re: The Problem With Fonts (RE: Font Selection Methodology)
• Re: And you wonder why people lurk...
• Re: And you wonder why people lurk...
• The Silence of the Snorkies
• Re: Why some people do not post - why some people leave the list
• Re: SDLC and role of Tech.Writers
• Re: Job Cuts - Telecom
• Re: Practical Limits of Files Size in MS Word
• Re: Practical Limits of Files Size in MS Word
• Re: Word Style Organizer
• Polish translation services

Kelley

• Re: (Possibly OT) Can I quote you?
• Re: What to use when analyzing text?
• Re: Why some people do not post - why some people leave the list
• RE: Who needs or uses technical writers?
• RE: Who needs or uses technical writers?
• re: Question about sending one's resume to companies
• Re: Question about sending one's resume to companies

Kelly Werner

• when is it right to be wrong?
• RE: When is it right to be wrong?
• RE: lurkers and lurking

Kerri Nussbaum

• Writer "levels"

Kerstin . Molthagen

• Antwort: STC Conference Speakers

Kevin Christy

• RE: Setting up a "Project" list
• RE: Word Processing File Conversion Software
• RE: Big Word Docs?
• RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
• RE: Job advice
• RE: WORD issue solved
• RE: Cases where bad documentation caused accidents or worse
• RE: Goodbye TECHWR-L (fwd)
• RE: Scanners with Optical Character Recognition (OCR)
• RE: Job Switch
• RE: Publish 400+ Excel Spreadsheets?
• RE: Publish 400+ Excel Spreadsheets?
• RE: Practical Limits of Files Size in MS Word